An international team of researchers including an
MIT graduate student has demonstrated for the first
time that genes exert influence on people's behavior
in a very common experimental economic game.
Traditionally, social scientists have been quite
hesitant to acknowledge a role for genes in explaining
economic behavior. But a study by David Cesarini, a
Ph.D. student in MIT's Department of Economics, and by
colleagues in Sweden indicates that there is a genetic
component to people's perception of what is fair and
what is unfair.
The paper, published in the Oct. 1 advanced online
issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, looked at the ultimatum game, in which a
proposer makes an offer to a responder on how to
divide a sum of money. This offer is an ultimatum; if
the responder rejects it, both parties receive
nothing.
Because rejections in the game entail a zero payoff
for both parties, theories of narrow self-interest
predict that any positive amount will be accepted by a
responder. The intriguing finding in the laboratory is
that responders routinely reject free money,
presumably in order to punish proposers for offers
perceived as unfair.
To study genetic influence in the game, Cesarini
and colleagues took the unusual step of recruiting
twins from the Swedish Twin Registry, and had them
play the game under controlled circumstances. Because
identical twins share the same genes but fraternal
twins do not, the researchers were able to detect
genetic influences by comparing the similarity with
which identical and fraternal twins played the game.
The researchers' findings suggest that genetic
influences account for as much as 40 percent of the
variation in how people respond to unfair offers. In
other words, identical twins were more likely to play
with the same strategy than fraternal twins.
"Compared to common environmental influences such
as upbringing, genetic influences appear to be a much
more important source of variation in how people play
the game," Cesarini said.
"This raises the intriguing possibility that many
of our preferences and personal economic choices are
subject to substantial genetic influence," said lead
author Bjorn Wallace of the Stockholm School of
Economics, who conceived of the study.
Other members of the research team include Paul
Lichtenstein of the Swedish Twin Registry and senior
author Magnus Johannesson of the Stockholm School of
Economics.
The research was funded by the Jan Wallander and
Tom Hedelius Foundation and the Swedish Research
Council.